Arab Press

بالشعب و للشعب
Sunday, Dec 22, 2024

Serbia still hasn't come to terms with the 1999 NATO bombing campaign

Serbia still hasn't come to terms with the 1999 NATO bombing campaign

No other event in modern Serbian history brings more Serbs together than the 1999 NATO bombing campaign.

The two-and-a-half-month operation involving major air strikes undoubtedly represents an experience of collective and personal trauma.

And every 24 March — the day the air raids to stop another war-crime-riddled campaign by strongman leader Slobodan Milošević began — Serbs relive their traumas of the last 20 and so years.

Yet, the majority of people in Serbia today see themselves as the only victims of what is referred to as NATO aggression, not intervention.

Kosovo's ethnic Albanians, who were the sole target of Milošević's forces in Serbia's then-province, either do not exist in this narrative, or are perceived as murderous, subhuman puppets of the West.

As this narrative of self-victimisation grew over the years, the space for reflection completely shrank, and the NATO military intervention itself is now viewed as a goal in its own right — an isolated event whose only purpose was to target Serbia and its people.

"This is an integral part of the conspiracy theory that is at the root of the lasting legacy of Milošević’s regime: the West has been out to get Serbia and Serbs in general for centuries."

Yugoslav Army forces patrol the destroyed military headquarters in downtown Belgrade, May 1999


It wasn’t the result of the systematic policy of repression and disenfranchisement of Kosovar Albanians that had been going on since the end of the 1980s, started by Milošević, one-sidedly diminishing the political autonomy of the province under the control of Belgrade, that ended up in bloodshed.

Not at all. It’s as if the US and the collective West made a secret plan to intervene militarily against the rump Yugoslavia comprising Serbia and Montenegro at the time and invented a reason for it instead.

This is an integral part of the conspiracy theory that is at the root of the lasting legacy of Milošević’s regime: the West has been out to get Serbia and Serbs in general for centuries.

Serbia belongs in Europe, but first, it has to overcome the barriers it built itself


The truth is, however, that there is no concrete historical obstacle or divide that stands in the way of cooperation and even integration of Serbia with the rest of Europe, to which it clearly belongs.

Milošević’s lust for unlimited power, his support for the wars which raged across the former Yugoslav republics, and his rejection of democracy and an open market economy are what built the wall that still separates Serbia from Europe.

It is an artificial barrier constructed by Belgrade’s own erroneous and criminal policies.

"In the end, the type of black-and-white thinking typical of populists everywhere has denied Serbia a shot at a complete catharsis."


Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic gives a speech announcing the arrest of alleged anti-Serbian ethnic Albanian leaders in Kosovo, 28 February 1989


While these particular policies ended by 2000 and the removal of Milošević from power by massive protests that saw him end up in front of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) at The Hague, the narratives his regime hung on to survive to this day.

In fact, they were actively reconstructed and expanded when Serbia’s new undisputed populist leader, Aleksandar Vučić, came to power in 2012.

While Vučić was careful not to repeat the mistakes of his predecessor and engage in direct conflict with the democratic world — he even facilitated cooperation with the EU and NATO alike — he intentionally made Milošević’s narrative of Serbs as the main victims of the Yugoslav wars official state propaganda once more.

In turn, this brought him votes and popular support.

What would ensue is more than a decade of an unrelenting campaign of disinformation in which Serbs have been shown — through newspapers and tabloids, TV channels, films and TV shows, public statements made by officials, faux independent experts and the Serb Orthodox Church clergy — as victims of Albanians, Croats and Bosniaks, and sometimes even Montenegrins.

This resulted in the whitewashing of Milošević’s policies for which he was tried at The Hague, while the chance for the nation’s self-reflection was eventually wasted.

And in the end, the type of black-and-white thinking typical of populists everywhere has denied Serbia a shot at a complete catharsis.


The opposition long embraced victimhood, too


A more nuanced view would show that it is indeed quite possible to mourn the deaths of innocent Serbian civilians during the bombing and to admit that Milošević and his allies were war criminals who brought destruction to their neighbours and, ultimately, their own country.

No sane Serbian would welcome the bombing of his own country, but any moral and decent citizen of Serbia would have stopped supporting Milošević as it became clear he was waging yet another conflict.

And yet, while more than two decades later, some 80% of the voters in the 2022 election opted for populist or outright nationalistic parties, parts of Serbia’s more liberal and progressive opposition (as they claim to be) paradoxically also promote Milošević’s narratives.

For instance, Vuk Jeremić, the former foreign minister of Serbia and the leader of the centre-right Narodna stranka or "People’s Party," openly wrote on Twitter on 24 March that the NATO campaign was aimed against the Serbian nation and not against Milošević’s regime.

"If those are the liberal talking points, one can then easily imagine what the nationalist and far-right parties are saying."


Intentionally or not, he illustrated this statement with a photograph of Baghdad in flames.

Even Dobrica Veselinović, the leader of the green-liberal Ne da(vi)mo Beograd or "Do Not Let Belgrade D(r)own" political movement, started his tweet on the same day with a condemnation of the “NATO aggression”.

If those are the liberal talking points, one can then easily imagine what the nationalist and far-right parties are saying.


Ethnonationalism feeds on self-righteousness


Beyond the collective trauma that the bombing campaign brought to the nation’s psyche lies the foundation of ethnonationalism — the dominant ideology in Serbia, but also the rest of the region, since the 1990s.

The nature of ethnonationalism is that it disregards the interests or suffering of neighbouring nations and focuses solely on a singular, own “righteous” nation.

"This hypothesis ... gave the people what they wanted: a sense of superiority over their neighbours while retaining the angelic aura of innocence that comes with victimhood."


Belgraders and Yugoslav army soldiers, hold a Serbian flag as they pose for photographers, showing the Serbian salute while celebrating the Kosovo peace deal, 9 June 1999


Through the lenses of Serbian ethnonationalists, ethnic Serbs have the right to secede from any other neighbouring country and form Greater Serbia.

Yet Albanians, Bosniaks, Hungarians, Romanians, Vlachs and Bulgarians, who all populate distinct regions of Serbia, have no such right, even if they are repressed at some point.

This hypothesis explains why Milošević’s narratives about Serbs as the only victims enjoyed and continue to enjoy such popularity.

After all, it gave the people what they wanted: a sense of superiority over their neighbours while retaining the angelic aura of innocence that comes with victimhood.

As a narrative, it's astonishingly myopic yet incredibly empowering: it simultaneously wholeheartedly supports aggression against the perpetual “other” and the feeling of being under constant existential threat by the same “other”.


The change has to come from within


The narrative in question is particularly resilient to outside change, and no amount of pressure from foreign democratic forces or factors can weaken it.

If anything, it cannot simply be displaced through foreign "carrot and stick" methods — as seen in the way Brussels has attempted to use the country's EU integration, for instance — because defeats, even when barely on the horizon, only further strengthen the feeling of victimhood.

"Forward-thinking, progressive Serbs must work together to find a way to bring their own society out of the depths of self-deluded ethnonationalism."

A Serb youth throws a wastebasket through the windows of a McDonald's restaurant in Belgrade, 30 March 1999


The only way out can be found from within. Forward-thinking, progressive Serbs must work together to find a way to bring their own society out of the depths of self-deluded ethnonationalism.

In this, they need and will need the support of the democratic world.

Newsletter

Related Articles

Arab Press
0:00
0:00
Close
Italy Slaps OpenAI with Landmark Fine: A Catalyst for Global Data Privacy Debate
Gaza Ceasefire Talks Approach Brink: Delicate Diplomacy at Play
Progress in Gaza Ceasefire Talks Amid Ongoing Conflict
Saudi Football Star Fahad Al-Muwallad in Critical Condition After Balcony Fall
Gaza Ceasefire Hangs by a Thread as Mediators Navigate a Stalemate of Epic Proportions
Syria's Future: A Fight for Democracy or Another Cycle of Oppression?
Gaza on the Brink: Economic Collapse and the Humanitarian Abyss
Ankara Ascends: Turkey's Rising Influence in Syria's Post-Assad Landscape
International Tensions Escalate Amid Gaza Conflict and Syrian Crisis
Gaza Conflict at Day 439: Renewed Ceasefire Hopes Amidst Ongoing Strife
Global Challenges: Syrian Repatriation, Natural Disasters, and Political Turmoil
U.S. Indicts Syrian Officials for Torture Amidst Assad's Overthrow: A New Era of Accountability and Diplomatic Reevaluation
Global Geopolitical Shifts: U.S. Strategy in Syria, Regional Tensions, and Calls for Nuclear Disarmament
Major Geopolitical Developments: Turkiye Reopens Border for Syrian Refugee Returns Amidst Regional Tensions and Political Transformations
Hypersonic Tensions: Yemen's Missile Disrupts Israel Amid Regional Escalation
Escalating Middle East Tensions and U.S. Tragedy: A Global Snapshot
Germany Suspends Syrian Asylum Decisions Amid Post-Assad Uncertainty
Israeli Airstrikes on Gaza: A Blow to Civilians and Press Freedom
Global Instability: UAE Advocates for Syrian Unity Amidst Middle East Tensions, Military Setback in Turkey, and Escalating Violence in Haiti
Key Regional Shifts in the Middle East Following Assad's Ouster: Challenges and Opportunities
France Supports Syria's Transition After Assad's Ouster Amid Middle East Turmoil
Recent Global Power Shifts: Political Upheavals and Security Challenges Redefining Nations
Global Conflicts and Health Developments: From Gaza's Hospital Crisis to Morocco's Medical Advancements
Transformative Shifts in Global Politics: The Fall of Assad, Maritime Piracy Threats, and Political Change in Ghana
Turbulent Transition: Syria's Political Upheaval and Global Reactions
Escalating Middle Eastern Conflicts and Political Tensions: A Snapshot of Global Unrest and Efforts for Stabilization
Syria's Crossroads: Can Hayat Tahrir al-Sham Lead a Unified Country After Assad's Fall?
End of an Era: Assad's Departure Amid Rebel Advances Signals Major Shift in Syria's Civil War
Global Shifts: UK Trade Missions, Korean Political Turmoil, and Syrian Conflict Dynamics
Escalating Global Tensions: Hospital Destruction in Gaza, Lebanese Military Movements, Alaskan Volcano Alert, Syrian Conflict Developments, Golan Heights Security, and U.S. Aid to Ukraine
Morocco Secures $13 Billion Investment for Railway Expansion at Africa Investment Forum
Israeli Strikes Devastate Gaza Hospital; EU Lifts Pakistan Airlines Ban; Global Holiday Traditions and Middle East Tensions Highlighted
Global Tensions and Shifts: From Netanyahu's Critique and African Political Instability to Syrian Rebel Advances and Renewed Middle East Peace Efforts
Military Diversity Debate, Gaza Clashes, Notre Dame's Rebirth, South Korean Political Crisis, Trump's Diplomatic Visit, and Ghana's Pivotal Election
U.S. State Department Urges Immediate Evacuation from Syria Amid Escalating Conflict and Strategic Power Shifts
Global Hotspots: Humanitarian Crises, Geopolitical Tensions, and Key Developments in Gaza, Lebanon, Colombia, Ghana, the UK, and Syria
Global Unrest and Diplomacy: Travel Warnings, Security Strategies, and Legal Challenges Highlight Shifting International Landscape
Key Global Developments: Crisis Management, Climate Impact, Diplomatic Changes, and Cultural Recognition
China-Taiwan Tensions Escalate Amid US Engagements; Global Diplomatic Challenges Unfold
Global Political Shifts: Impeachment in South Korea, Taiwan's US Outreach, Syrian Humanitarian Crisis, and Notable Developments in the UK, India, and Southeast Asia
Escalating Global Crises: High-Profile Manhunt, Antisemitic Violence in Australia, Middle East Tensions, Iran's Space Ambitions, and Strategic Military Patrols in Asia-Pacific
Tragic Loss: Al Jazeera Journalist Killed Amid Escalating Gaza Violence
Exodus from Beirut: The Drastic Closure of Skies and Its Implications for Lebanon
Seismic Stability, Tech Innovation, and Diplomatic Strategies: Key Developments in California, US Policy, and Global Conflict
Global Dynamics: Middle Eastern Alliances, Western Political Challenges, and Shifts in European Geopolitics
Global Headlines: Search for NZ Climbers, Namibia's First Female President, French Political Shifts, US CEO Assassination, Jenin Tensions, and Syrian Exodus
Top Boy's Name in England and Wales Reveals Cultural Shift; International Rescue in Red Sea Highlights Maritime Cooperation; Middle East Tensions and Humanitarian Crises Escalate Amid Ceasefire Hopes
Global Tensions and Transformations: Military Criticism, Diplomatic Strains, Syrian Conflict Shifts, EU Aspirations, and Judicial Challenges
Global Crisis Overview: Renewed Conflict in Syria, Security Challenges in the Philippines, Political Turmoil in France, Allegations in Iraq, and Humanitarian Appeals for Sudan.
Global Diplomacy and Humanitarian Efforts Amid Rising Tensions: Key Developments and Challenges
×