During a meeting at the White House, President Trump discussed the potential influx of displaced Palestinians to Jordan, while reports emerge about significant cuts to U.S. foreign aid affecting independent media worldwide.
On Tuesday, former U.S. President
Donald Trump engaged in discussions with Jordan's King Abdullah II during a visit to the White House, where the topic of potential Palestinian displacement was raised.
This meeting marked the first occasion that an Arab leader met with Trump since a proposal surfaced suggesting an influx of displaced Palestinians from Gaza.
King Abdullah indicated his commitment to what he deemed best for Jordan, stating that the country would accept 2,000 sick children from Gaza for medical treatment.
Trump praised this gesture, stating, 'The point is how to make this work in a way that is good for everybody.' However, Abdullah's uncomfortable demeanor suggested a lack of explicit support for Trump's broader plans regarding Palestinian resettlement.
In a subsequent post on social media platform X, the king reaffirmed Jordan's longstanding opposition to the displacement of Palestinians in both Gaza and the occupied West Bank.
Simultaneously, Trump's administration is facing significant criticism following a decision to suspend billions of dollars in foreign aid, particularly funding distributed through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
Reports indicate that over $268 million designated for independent media and civil society initiatives is now jeopardized.
USAID previously provided support to approximately 707 media outlets and 279 organizations focused on enhancing the state of independent journalism across more than 30 countries.
Media advocacy groups, including Reporters Without Borders (RSF), have expressed serious concerns that these aid suspensions could lead to a decline in independent media organizations, which are crucial for mitigating misinformation and curbing state propaganda.
RSF reported that many media projects are now at risk of ceasing operations, resulting in layoffs among affected organizations.
Among the nations impacted, Ukraine has been particularly vocal about the ramifications of these funding cuts.
Anna Babinets, CEO of the investigative journalism outlet Slidstvo.Info, stated that the loss of USAID funding has forced her organization to consider reducing its frontline reporting capabilities amidst ongoing conflicts.
In Belarus, Natalia Belikova from Press Club Belarus reported that her organization, heavily reliant on U.S. funding, is also facing existential threats due to the aid freeze.
The implications of these aid cuts extend beyond Europe; organizations in regions like Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East have voiced similar concerns.
Notably, independent journalism in
Afghanistan is under severe restrictions following Taliban rule, and the suspension of U.S. aid threatens the survival of various media outlets operating in exile.
Experts warn that diminished support for independent media can create vacuums that may be exploited by less reliable sources, significantly affecting the flow of accurate information globally.
As independent reporting faces increased challenges, calls for alternative funding solutions are growing within the international community, particularly as independent news organizations grapple with questions about sustainability under the current political climate.