Arab Press

بالشعب و للشعب
Wednesday, Oct 01, 2025

Women remain invisible in debates about the future of Canada

Women remain invisible in debates about the future of Canada

Jacqueline Hansen: I am a middle-aged single mom from rural Quebec, and I feel invisible during this election campaign

I am a middle-aged, middle-class, single mother of a primary school-aged child, living in rural Quebec. I also happen to be a gender rights expert for Amnesty International. I have spent this federal election campaign shaking my head, baffled at how party leaders’ discourse has little connection to my life, or the lived realities of more than half of Canada’s population.

Last night, during the official English-language federal leaders debate, the four men on stage spoke over each other about a woman’s right to choose, until NDP leader Jagmeet Singh said, “A man has no position on a woman’s right to choose.” This was followed by Elizabeth May, leader of the Green Party, stating, “How about a woman’s right to speak in a debate?”

During the French-language TVA debate last week, the aforementioned men on stage affirmed they would not re-open the abortion debate. And during the Macleans-CityTV leaders debate last month, the only mention of women’s rights and gender equality came in the form of Singh’s comment to May about her position on a woman’s right to choose.

Thank you, party leaders, for not re-opening the abortion debate, even though there’s been no groundswell of public support calling for this debate to be re-opened. If you do want to debate sexual health, the real issue is the lack of consistent access to comprehensive sex-ed and sexual health services including abortion, across Canada.

Two weeks ago, CBC launched its SMS election tool. I sent an SMS to 22222 asking “What are the party’s positions on women’s rights and gender equality?” and it responded by sharing each party’s position on abortion. This confirmed, once again, that in this federal election campaign, abortion rights and women’s rights have been incorrectly conflated.

Women, transgender, non-binary, and two-spirit people make up more than half Canada’s population. We are not a homogenous group, but I am confident that abortion rights are not the sole issue on our minds during this election.

And yet, history has taught me that I should not be shocked that women’s rights and gender equality issues are not top priority for the mostly male-identifying politicians, who are leading political parties and running for office. In fact, the last federal leaders debate on women’s issues was held 35 years ago.

But it’s 2019, and in the era of #TimesUp and #MeToo I have rightly come to expect more-and better-from politicians. This is precisely why women’s rights and equality-seeking organizations from across Canada joined forces to launch Up for Debate, a campaign calling for a federal leaders debate on women’s rights and gender equality. We know that without a specific and separate space for these issues to be discussed, they become invisible. However, regrettably, with days to go until the federal election, not all party leaders have committed to participating.

All six federal party leaders did agree to participate in this week’s English and French language official leaders debates. According to the newly formed Leaders Debates Commission, headed by former Governor General David Johnston, the debates “will help you make your own decision about the issues that matter to you. It is also an opportunity to learn about issues that matter to other Canadians, and be exposed to views that are different from your own, and those around you. It’s a window into the world of others.”

Given this mandate, I had high hopes for the official, English-language debate. But these hopes were dashed when not one single question was asked about women’s rights and gender equality, and leaders missed critical opportunities to speak to these issues in their responses. I was gobsmacked that all six leaders failed to address the gender wage gap in response to a question specifically about income inequality. This was particularly egregious given that Statistics Canada released a report just hours before the debate, stating that women in Canada continue to make only $0.87 for every $1.00 a man earns.

All six party leaders have consistently failed to conduct gender-based analysis plus on their responses to debate questions. Gender-based analysis plus (GBA+) is a tool to assess “how diverse groups of women, men and non-binary people may experience policies, programs and initiatives,” according to the government’s Status of Women Canada website. “The ‘plus’ in GBA+ acknowledges that GBA goes beyond biological (sex) and socio-cultural (gender) differences. We all have multiple identity factors that intersect to make us who we are,” it continues. Those identify factors include race, ethnicity, religion, age, and mental or physical disability, among others.

Since the government of Canada has an arm of government committed to implementing GBA+ in all its work, the next Prime Minister of Canada will be expected to understand and assess how policies and initiatives will impact people of different genders. What better way for those vying to become PM to show off their GBA+ skills than during leaders debates?

When formulating responses to questions about the economy, leaders missed the opportunity to explore how Canada’s economic policies impact people of diverse genders in different ways. They missed the chance to articulate their understanding of how poverty differently and disproportionately impacts women, transgender, non-binary, and two-spirit people, and how they will reflect these diverse experiences in their poverty-elimination strategies, including the steps they will take to end the gender wage gap, and to improve access to childcare.

It should be impossible for party leaders to speak of Indigenous rights without acknowledging the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, and without announcing what concrete actions they will take to end the violence that disproportionately impacts First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women, girls, and two-spirit people. Party leaders also failed to recognize that rates of sexual violence have remained unchanged for years, and to commit to developing a national action plan involving all levels of government, to prevent and address gender-based violence.

Considering abortion rights are not up for debate; leaders could have pivoted the discussion to share plans that ensure that every person in Canada has access to comprehensive sexuality education, contraceptives and abortion services. Recognizing that women’s shelters, other frontline service providers, and advocates working to promote women’s rights and gender equality are chronically underfunded, parties could have talked about long-term, stable funding for women’s and equality-seeking movements.

Foreign policy hasn’t been deeply debated this election campaign, but party leaders failed to articulate their vision of a feminist foreign policy for Canada. They didn’t go beyond discussions of foreign-aid funding to address difficult issues such as the contradiction of advocating for women’s rights in Saudi Arabia while selling arms to the Saudi government.

People brave the cold as they make their way towards Queen's Park during the Toronto Women's March on Saturday, January 19, 2019. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Tijana Martin

Jacqueline Hansen is Amnesty International Canada’s gender rights campaigner.

I am a middle-aged, middle-class, single mother of a primary school-aged child, living in rural Quebec. I also happen to be a gender rights expert for Amnesty International. I have spent this federal election campaign shaking my head, baffled at how party leaders’ discourse has little connection to my life, or the lived realities of more than half of Canada’s population.

Last night, during the official English-language federal leaders debate, the four men on stage spoke over each other about a woman’s right to choose, until NDP leader Jagmeet Singh said, “A man has no position on a woman’s right to choose.” This was followed by Elizabeth May, leader of the Green Party, stating, “How about a woman’s right to speak in a debate?”

During the French-language TVA debate last week, the aforementioned men on stage affirmed they would not re-open the abortion debate. And during the Macleans-CityTV leaders debate last month, the only mention of women’s rights and gender equality came in the form of Singh’s comment to May about her position on a woman’s right to choose.

Thank you, party leaders, for not re-opening the abortion debate, even though there’s been no groundswell of public support calling for this debate to be re-opened. If you do want to debate sexual health, the real issue is the lack of consistent access to comprehensive sex-ed and sexual health services including abortion, across Canada.

Two weeks ago, CBC launched its SMS election tool. I sent an SMS to 22222 asking “What are the party’s positions on women’s rights and gender equality?” and it responded by sharing each party’s position on abortion. This confirmed, once again, that in this federal election campaign, abortion rights and women’s rights have been incorrectly conflated.

Women, transgender, non-binary, and two-spirit people make up more than half Canada’s population. We are not a homogenous group, but I am confident that abortion rights are not the sole issue on our minds during this election.

And yet, history has taught me that I should not be shocked that women’s rights and gender equality issues are not top priority for the mostly male-identifying politicians, who are leading political parties and running for office. In fact, the last federal leaders debate on women’s issues was held 35 years ago.

But it’s 2019, and in the era of #TimesUp and #MeToo I have rightly come to expect more—and better—from politicians. This is precisely why women’s rights and equality-seeking organizations from across Canada joined forces to launch Up for Debate, a campaign calling for a federal leaders debate on women’s rights and gender equality. We know that without a specific and separate space for these issues to be discussed, they become invisible. However, regrettably, with days to go until the federal election, not all party leaders have committed to participating.

All six federal party leaders did agree to participate in this week’s English and French language official leaders debates. According to the newly formed Leaders Debates Commission, headed by former Governor General David Johnston, the debates “will help you make your own decision about the issues that matter to you. It is also an opportunity to learn about issues that matter to other Canadians, and be exposed to views that are different from your own, and those around you. It’s a window into the world of others.”

Given this mandate, I had high hopes for the official, English-language debate. But these hopes were dashed when not one single question was asked about women’s rights and gender equality, and leaders missed critical opportunities to speak to these issues in their responses. I was gobsmacked that all six leaders failed to address the gender wage gap in response to a question specifically about income inequality. This was particularly egregious given that Statistics Canada released a report just hours before the debate, stating that women in Canada continue to make only $0.87 for every $1.00 a man earns.

All six party leaders have consistently failed to conduct gender-based analysis plus on their responses to debate questions. Gender-based analysis plus (GBA+) is a tool to assess “how diverse groups of women, men and non-binary people may experience policies, programs and initiatives,” according to the government’s Status of Women Canada website. “The ‘plus’ in GBA+ acknowledges that GBA goes beyond biological (sex) and socio-cultural (gender) differences. We all have multiple identity factors that intersect to make us who we are,” it continues. Those identify factors include race, ethnicity, religion, age, and mental or physical disability, among others.

Since the government of Canada has an arm of government committed to implementing GBA+ in all its work, the next Prime Minister of Canada will be expected to understand and assess how policies and initiatives will impact people of different genders. What better way for those vying to become PM to show off their GBA+ skills than during leaders debates?

When formulating responses to questions about the economy, leaders missed the opportunity to explore how Canada’s economic policies impact people of diverse genders in different ways. They missed the chance to articulate their understanding of how poverty differently and disproportionately impacts women, transgender, non-binary, and two-spirit people, and how they will reflect these diverse experiences in their poverty-elimination strategies, including the steps they will take to end the gender wage gap, and to improve access to childcare.

It should be impossible for party leaders to speak of Indigenous rights without acknowledging the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, and without announcing what concrete actions they will take to end the violence that disproportionately impacts First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women, girls, and two-spirit people. Party leaders also failed to recognize that rates of sexual violence have remained unchanged for years, and to commit to developing a national action plan involving all levels of government, to prevent and address gender-based violence.

Considering abortion rights are not up for debate; leaders could have pivoted the discussion to share plans that ensure that every person in Canada has access to comprehensive sexuality education, contraceptives and abortion services. Recognizing that women’s shelters, other frontline service providers, and advocates working to promote women’s rights and gender equality are chronically underfunded, parties could have talked about long-term, stable funding for women’s and equality-seeking movements.

Foreign policy hasn’t been deeply debated this election campaign, but party leaders failed to articulate their vision of a feminist foreign policy for Canada. They didn’t go beyond discussions of foreign-aid funding to address difficult issues such as the contradiction of advocating for women’s rights in Saudi Arabia while selling arms to the Saudi government.

Women, transgender, non-binary, and two-spirit people in Canada lead multi-dimensional lives. We experience inequality in different forms, and to different degrees. But we do not have the same opportunities as most cisgender men, who to live in safety and dignity, free from discrimination and violence. This inequality is perpetuated when we remain invisible in debates about the future of our country. I am a middle-aged single mom from rural Quebec, and I feel invisible during this election campaign.

Federal party leaders: it’s 2019. When are you going to be up for debating women’s rights and gender equality?

Newsletter

Related Articles

Arab Press
0:00
0:00
Close
Altman Says GPT-5 Already Outpaces Him, Warns AI Could Automate 40% of Work
Trump Organization Teams with Saudi Developer on $1 Billion Trump Plaza in Jeddah
Archaeologists Recover Statues and Temples from 2,000-Year-Old Sunken City off Alexandria
Colombian President Petro Vows to Mobilize Volunteers for Gaza and Joins List of Fighters
Nvidia and Abu Dhabi’s TII Launch First AI-&-Robotics Lab in the Middle East
UK, Canada, and Australia Officially Recognise Palestine in Historic Shift
Dubai Property Boom Shows Strain as Flippers Get Buyer’s Remorse
JWST Data Brings TRAPPIST-1e Closer to Earth-Like Habitability
UAE-US Stargate Project Poised to Make Abu Dhabi a Global AI Powerhouse
Saudi Arabia cracks down on music ‘lounges’ after conservative backlash
Saudi Arabia Signs ‘Strategic Mutual Defence’ Pact with Pakistan, Marking First Arab State to Gain Indirect Access to Nuclear Strike Capabilities in the Region
Turkish car manufacturer Togg Enters German Market with 5-Star Electric Sedan and SUV to Challenge European EV Brands
World’s Longest Direct Flight China Eastern to Launch 29-Hour Shanghai–Buenos Aires Direct Flight via Auckland in December
New OpenAI Study Finds Majority of ChatGPT Use Is Personal, Not Professional
Kuwait opens bidding for construction of three cities to ease housing crunch.
Indian Student Engineers Propose “Project REBIRTH” to Protect Aircraft from Crashes Using AI, Airbags and Smart Materials
Could AI Nursing Robots Help Healthcare Staffing Shortages?
Turkish authorities seize leading broadcaster amid fraud and tax investigation
Apple Introduces Ultra-Thin iPhone Air, Enhanced 17 Series and New Health-Focused Wearables
Big Oil Slashes Jobs and Investments Amid Prolonged Low Crude Prices
Social Media Access Curtailed in Turkey After CHP Calls for Rallies Following Police Blockade of Istanbul Headquarters
Gold Could Reach Nearly $5,000 if Fed Independence Is Undermined, Goldman Sachs Warns
Uruguay, Colombia and Paraguay Secure Places at 2026 World Cup
Trump Administration Advances Plans to Rebrand Pentagon as Department of War Instead of the Fake Term Department of Defense
Tether Expands into Gold Sector with Profit-Driven Diversification
Trump’s New War – and the ‘Drug Tyrant’ Fearing Invasion: ‘1,200 Missiles Aimed at Us’
At the Parade in China: Laser Weapons, 'Eagle Strike,' and a Missile Capable of 'Striking Anywhere in the World'
Information Warfare in the Age of AI: How Language Models Become Targets and Tools
Israeli Airstrike in Yemen Kills Houthi Prime Minister
After the Shock of Defeat, Iranians Yearn for Change
YouTube Altered Content by Artificial Intelligence – Without Permission
Iran Faces Escalating Water Crisis as Protests Spread
More Than Half a Million Evacuated as Typhoon Kajiki Heads for Vietnam
HSBC Switzerland Ends Relationships with Over 1,000 Clients from Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Qatar, and Egypt
Sharia Law Made Legally Binding in Austria Despite Warnings Over 'Incompatible' Values
Dogfights in the Skies: Airbus on Track to Overtake Boeing and Claim Aviation Supremacy
Tim Cook Promises an AI Revolution at Apple: "One of the Most Significant Technologies of Our Generation"
Are AI Data Centres the Infrastructure of the Future or the Next Crisis?
Miles Worth Billions: How Airlines Generate Huge Profits
Zelenskyy Returns to White House Flanked by European Allies as Trump Pressures Land-Swap Deal with Putin
Beijing is moving into gold and other assets, diversifying away from the dollar
Trump Backs Putin’s Land-for-Peace Proposal Amid Kyiv’s Rejection
Zelenskyy to Visit Washington after Trump–Putin Summit Yields No Agreement
Iranian Protection Offers Chinese Vehicle Shipments a Cost Advantage over Japanese and Korean Makers
United States Sells Luxury Yacht Amadea, Valued at Approximately $325 Million, in First Sale of a Seized Russian Yacht Since the Invasion of Ukraine
Saudi Arabia accelerates renewables to curb domestic oil use
Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodríguez announce engagement
Asia-Pacific dominates world’s busiest flight routes, with South Korea’s Jeju–Seoul corridor leading global rankings
Private Welsh island with 19th-century fort listed for sale at over £3 million
Sam Altman challenges Elon Musk with plans for Neuralink rival
×